Wednesday, April 9, 2008
The peoples right to leave?
What is the only state in the union of the United States that has the right of succession as defined in their state constitution? That would be Texas, the lone star state. Now when I mention this most people laugh and say that even if Texas wanted to do that, that the rest of the nation wouldn’t allow them to leave. Well this brings up the questions does a specific area if that area is large and has a substantial majority with in it have the right to make a new government with few if any ties to their previous government? In my opinion they do as long as they have true grievances against their mother nation. One example of this would be Tibet against China, you see Tibet has attempted to secede from China for a while now and ever time they get close or even attempt to peacefully protest China sends in the troops to break it up, imposing marshal law and killing anyone who refuses to do what they say. It is these types of things that would constitute actually grievances that might even call for a violent revolution against such a suppressive government. Currently, China has said that if they do not surrender to the punishment of China for trying to peacefully protest that eventually led to violent riots in the streets because of the presence of Chinese troops. So I would support any group that has actual grievances against a government such as suppression and hatred of their beliefs instead of just wanting to rule your own society and acting on it on a whim. This is my belief when it comes to the United States, which all states have an inherent right to succeed; however the other states also have the right to do everything in their power to prevent it short of starting a civil war, except when it is absolutely necessary.
Labels:
China,
Confederates,
CSA,
death,
revolution,
Seccetion,
Tebet,
Texas,
USA,
violence
The possibility of life not from earth
To most people when they hear three little letters they immediately toon out of the conversation, those letters are U.F.O or unidentified flying object, which is almost always used as a synonym for Alien space craft in our “modern unsuperstishus society.” However when our government talks about UFOs or uses the term they are in most instances talking about just that an Unidentified Flying object, usually a spy sadilight or perhaps a plain that is not on the government roster. Stupid I know, however I am not talking about the conspiracy theorist stuff hear, I am talking about the probability that there I life other then our selves in this universe or even this existence? So what is the realistic probability? Well lets think about this realistically and practically for just a second, there are billions and billions of galaxies, and in these galaxies there are billions even trillions of solar systems, in each solar system there are any where from zero to three hundred planet sized rocks to record, this is not to mention the possibility of multiple universes, something that has been discussed quite fervently by many people I know. So who is to say that we are the only ones to ever exist and will be the only ones ever to exist? For example if you believe in evolution and you do not believe that there are aliens in our existence, you are basically telling me that evolution is something that is known only to our planit, and that life can and will never exist on other planets because of what? In fact this theory supports the existence of other life. As well if you believe in a god, do you truly think that god made a trillion tiny asteroids floating in the void of space so that man kind can simply gaze at them? I don’t by that for a minute, god or the gods who or what ever supreme being you believe in always dos something purposely, with intention dos he, she, or them not? The existence of brothers and sisters of ours in the stars is real, now weather we will ever have contact or have had contact is something all together different.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)